Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová

2020, Vol: 10, Issue: 1

10 / 1Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Cover Letter
Title Page

Original Research

J Environ Occup Sci. 2017; 6(2): 40-44

doi: 10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová.

Abstract
Backround: Different skin cancer types display disparate body site distribution, particularly related to sunlight exposure pattern. We evaluated topographic distribution and relative tumor density (RTD) in a set of human cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases. Material and methods: A total of 186 MMs from 182 subjects, 1184 BCCs from 899 subjects, and 146 SCCs from 114 subjects were analyzed. Results: MMs occured most commonly on the trunk (46.8%) and upper limbs (25.3%). While the back, and the trunk in particular were sites with the most frequent MM development in males (64.3% and 45.9%), the upper limbs were the most common location in females (34.1%). BCCs and SCCs occured predominantly on the head and neck, comprising a total of 69.0% and 81.5% of the cases. The face was a region with by far the highest RTDs in BCC and SCC patients. Men had more frequently affected extra-facial sites of the head and neck compared to women in both, the BCC (46% vs 31.9%) and SCC (62.5% vs 48.3%) cases. In BCC, the second most frequent anatomic site included the back in both genders (25.1% in males, 18.2% in females), but in SCC, it represented the trunk as a whole in males (13.6%), and the lower limbs in females (14.3%). The greatest differences in RTDs between BCC and SCC were on the back (BCC:SCC ratio, 7.5:1), especially in men (BCC:SCC ratio, 9:1). Conclusion: We have observed striking heterogeneity for skin cancers risk by anatomic site with apparent gender-related disparities. Knowledge about spatial density and body site predilection of cutaneous malignancies may provide better insight into their pathogenesis and help to improve basic preventive strategies.

Key words: skin carcinomas, anatomic distribution, sunlight exposure pattern

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Vladimír Bartoš Articles by Milada Kullová
	on Google
	on Google Scholar
	Article Statistics
	Viewed: 3157 Downloaded: 597

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. J Environ Occup Health. 2017; 6(2): 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Web Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. http://www.jenvoh.com/?mno=257279 [Access: February 16, 2020]. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. J Environ Occup Health. 2017; 6(2): 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. J Environ Occup Health. (2017), [cited February 16, 2020]; 6(2): 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Harvard Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová (2017) Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. J Environ Occup Health, 6 (2), 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Turabian Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. 2017. Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 (2), 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Chicago Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová. "Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience." Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health 6 (2017), 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Vladimír Bartoš, Milada Kullová (2017) Body Site Distribution and Relative Tumor Density of Different Human Cutaneous Malignancies with Emphasis on Sunlight Exposure: A Single Institution Experience. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 (2), 40-44. doi:10.5455/jeos.20170416072408

Contact Information

Your comments are very important to us

How to cite this article

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. The articles in Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Copyright © 2020 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information Your comments are very important to us We welcome your ideas, suggestions, comments, or questions. To reach Editorial Board please use one of the methods provided below. Email us at info[at]scopemed.com We will respond within 48 to 72 hours. Change of address or personal information? Please visit your account at www.ejmanager.com to update your information.